FSD1289 Measures of Democracy 1810-2018
The dataset is (A) openly available for all users without registration.
Study description in other languages
Measures of Democracy 1810-2018
Dataset ID Number
- Vanhanen, Tatu (University of Tampere. Department of Political Science and International Relations)
The data contain three different variables, created by Tatu Vanhanen in his long-term research, for each year from 1810 to 2018. The variables in question are political competition, political participation and the index of democratization.
The competition variable portrays the electoral success of smaller parties, that is, the percentage of votes gained by the smaller parties in parliamentary and/or presidential elections. The variable is calculated by subtracting from 100 the percentage of votes won by the largest party (the party which wins most votes) in parliamentary elections or by the party of the successful candidate in presidential elections. Depending on their importance, either parliamentary or presidential elections are used in the calculation of the variable, or both elections are used, with weights. If information on the distribution of votes is not available, or if the distribution does not portray the reality accurately, the distribution of parliamentary seats is used instead. If parliament members are elected but political parties are not allowed to take part in elections, it is assumed that one party has taken all votes or seats. In countries where parties are not banned but yet only independent candidates participate in elections, it is assumed that the share of the largest party is not over 30 percent.
The political participation variable portrays the voting turnout in each election, and is calculated as the percentage of the total population who actually voted in the election. In the case of indirect elections, only votes cast in the final election are taken into account. If electors have not been elected by citizens, only the number of actual electors is taken into account, which means that the degree of participation drops to the value 0. If an election to choose electors has been held, the participation variable is calculated from the number and distribution of votes in that election. National referendums raise the variable value by five percent and state (regional) referendums by one percent for the year they are held. Referendums can add the degree of participation at maximum by 30 percent a year. The value of the combined degree of participation cannot be higher than 70 percent, even in cases where the sum of participation and referendums would be higher than 70.
The index of democratization is formed by multiplying the competition and the participation variables and then dividing the outcome by 100.
democracy; democratization; political participation; political parties; politics; voting
- Social sciences (Fields of Science Classification)
- International politics and organisations (from the vocabulary CESSDA Topic Classification)
The dataset is (A) openly available for all users without registration.
- Vanhanen, Tatu (University of Tampere. Department of Political Science and International Relations)
- Lundell, Krister (Åbo Akademi University. Department of Political Science)
Time Period Covered
1810 – 2018
1970 – 2019
United Arab Emirates, Afghanistan, Antigua and Barbuda, Albania, Armenia, Angola, Argentina, Austria, Australia, Azerbaijan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Barbados, Bangladesh, Belgium, Burkina Faso, Bulgaria, Bahrain, Burundi, Benin, Brunei, Bolivia, Brazil, Bahamas, Bhutan, Botswana, Belarus, Belize, Canada, Congo (Zaire), Central African Republic, Congo (Brazzaville), Switzerland, Ivory Coast (Côte d'Ivoire), Chile, Cameroon, China, Colombia, Costa Rica, Czechoslovakia, Cuba, Cape Verde, Cyprus, Czech Republic, German Democratic Republic GDR, Germany, West-Germany, Djibouti, Denmark, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Algeria, Ecuador, Estonia, Egypt, Eritrea, Spain, Ethiopia, Finland, Fiji, Micronesia, France, Gabon, United Kingdom, Grenada, Georgia, Ghana, Gambia, Guinea, Equatorial Guinea, Greece, Guatemala, Guinea-Bissau, Guyana, Honduras, Croatia, Haiti, Hungary, Indonesia, Ireland, Israel, India, Iraq, Iran, Iceland, Italy, Jamaica, Jordan, Japan, Kenya, Kyrgyzstan, Cambodia, Kiribati, Comoros, Saint Kitts and Nevis, North Korea, South Korea, Kuwait, Kazakhstan, Laos, Lebanon, Saint Lucia, Sri Lanka, Liberia, Lesotho, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Latvia, Libya, Morocco, Moldova, Madagascar, Marshall Islands, Macedonia, Mali, Myanmar (Burma), Mongolia, Mauritania, Malta, Mauritius, Maldives, Malawi, Mexico, Malaysia, Montenegro, Mozambique, Namibia, Niger, Nigeria, Nicaragua, The Netherlands, Norway, Nepal, New Zealand, Oman, Panama, Peru, Papua New Guinea, Philippines, Pakistan, Poland, Portugal, Paraguay, Qatar, Romania, Russia, Rwanda, Saudi Arabia, Solomon Islands, Seychelles, Sudan, Sweden, Singapore, Slovenia, Slovakia, Sierra Leone, Senegal, Somalia, Serbia, Suriname, Sao Tome and Principe, Russia (USSR, Soviet Union), El Salvador, Syria, Swaziland, Chad, Togo, Thailand, Tajikistan, Timor-Leste, Turkmenistan, Tunisia, Tonga, Turkey, Trinidad and Tobago, Taiwan, Tanzania, Ukraine, Uganda, United States, Uruguay, Uzbekistan, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Venezuela, Vietnam, Western Samoa, Vanuatu, Yemen, Yugoslavia, South Africa, Zambia, Zimbabwe, North Vietnam, North Yemen, South Vietnam, South Yemen
Afghanistan, Albania, Algeria, Angola, Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Armenia, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belgium, Belize, Benin, Bhutan, Bolivia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Botswana, Brazil, Brunei, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Myanmar (Burma), Burundi, Cambodia, Cameroon, Canada, Cape Verde, Central African Republic, Chad, Chile, China, Colombia, Comoros, Congo (Brazzaville), Congo (Zaire), Costa Rica, Ivory Coast (Côte d'Ivoire), Croatia, Cuba, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Czechoslovakia, Denmark, Djibouti, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Estonia, Ethiopia, Fiji, Finland, France, Gabon, Gambia, German Democratic Republic GDR, Germany, West-Germany, Georgia, Ghana, Grenada, Greece, Guatemala, Guinea-Bissau, Guinea, Guyana, Haiti, Honduras, Hungary, Iceland, India, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Kiribati, North Korea, South Korea, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Laos, Latvia, Lebanon, Lesotho, Liberia, Libya, Lithuania, Macedonia, Luxembourg, Madagascar, Malawi, Malaysia, Maldives, Mali, Malta, Marshall Islands, Mauritania, Mauritius, Mexico, Micronesia, Moldova, Mongolia, Montenegro, Morocco, Mozambique, Namibia, Nepal, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Niger, Nigeria, Norway, Oman, Pakistan, Panama, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Romania, Russia, Russia (USSR, Soviet Union), Rwanda, Western Samoa, Sao Tome and Principe, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Serbia, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, Solomon Islands, Somalia, South Africa, Spain, Sri Lanka, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Sudan, Suriname, Swaziland, Sweden, Switzerland, Syria, Taiwan, Tajikistan, Tanzania, Thailand, Timor-Leste, Togo, Tonga, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Uganda, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, United States, Uruguay, Uzbekistan, Vanuatu, Venezuela, Vietnam, North Vietnam, South Vietnam, Yemen, North Yemen, South Yemen, Yugoslavia, Zambia, Zimbabwe
Analysis/Observation Unit Type
Political-administrative area (Country)
All independent states, their predecessors and Taiwan (excluding "the states with less than 40000 inhabitants; former states and principalities that no longer exist; former colonies; precolonial states and political communities of Asia and Africa")
See related material
Total universe/Complete enumeration
The data contains information on all states found in openly available public documents.
Data collection guidelines: Secondary data collection guide
Data File Language
Downloaded data package may contain different language versions of the same files.
The data files of this dataset are available in the following languages: Finnish and English.
FSD translates quantitative data into English on request, free of charge. More information on ordering data translation.
Number of Cases and Variables
628 variables and 191 cases.
FSD1216 Democratization and Power Resources 1850-2000
FSD2140 Gender-Weighted Index of Democratization 1995-2010
FSD2420 Index of Power Resources (IPR) 2007
The data and its creators shall be cited in all publications and presentations for which the data have been used. The bibliographic citation may be in the form suggested by the archive or in the form required by the publication.
Vanhanen, Tatu (University of Tampere): Measures of Democracy 1810-2018 [dataset]. Version 8.0 (2019-06-17). Finnish Social Science Data Archive [distributor]. http://urn.fi/urn:nbn:fi:fsd:T-FSD1289
The user shall notify the archive of all publications where she or he has used the data.
The original data creators and the archive bear no responsibility for any results or interpretations arising from the reuse of the data.
See more information in the attachments of the codebook (cbF1289e.pdf)
Buitenzorgy, M. & Mol, A.P.J. (2011). Does Democracy Lead to a Better Environment? Deforestation and the Democratic Transition Peak. Environmental and Resource Economics 48(1), 59-70. doi:10.1007/s10640-010-9397-y
Democratization (2009). Eds. Haerpfer, Christian W. & Bernhagen, Patrick & Inglehart, Ronald F. & Welzel, Christian. New York: Oxford University Press.
Easton, M.R. & Montinola, G.R. (2016) Remittances, Regime Type, and Government Spending Priorities. In Studies in Comparative International Development, December 2016.
Hackl, Franz & Halla, Martin & Pruckner, Gerald J. (2010). Volunteering and the state. Public Choice. Published online: 30 December 2010. doi:10.1007/s11127-010-9754-y
Hayo, Bernd & Voigt, Stefan (2010). Determinants of constitutional change: Why do countries change their form of government? Journal of Comparative Economics 38(3), 283-305. doi:10.1016/j.jce.2010.07.007
Hayo, Bernd & Voigt, Stefan (2011). Endogenous constitutions: Politics and politicians matter, economic outcomes don't. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. Available online 1 October 2011. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2011.09.013
Kisielewski, Michael & Rosa, Juan Carlos & Asher, Jane (2010). Statistical Approaches to developing Indicators of Armed Violence. Geneva: Technical paper prepared by StatAid for Small Arms Survey.
Kotschy, Rainer and Uwe Sunde (2017) Inequality, Democracy, and Institutional Quality. Published in European Economic Review 91(1), pp. 209-228.
Kurkova, Tereza (2015). Vliv nerostneho bohatstvi na uroven demokracie v Latinske Americe. Univerzita Hradec Kralove. Filozoficka fakulta. Katedra politologie. Diplomova prace
Lertangtam, Issares (2014). Unpacking the impact of democracy on terrorism. Albany: University at Albany. State University of New York. Rockefeller College of Public Affairs and Policy. Department of Political Science.
Li, Z. (2019) Electoral Practice, Rules and Fairness: Democracy and Incentives for Respect for Physical Integrate Rights. (Master's dissertation) University College London. London.
Lynn, Richard & Vanhanen, Tatu (2006). IQ and Global Inequality. Augusta, GA: Washington Summit Publishers.
Meisenberg, Gerhard (2011). National IQ and economic outcomes. Personality and Individual Differences. Corrected Proof, Aug 2011. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.06.022
Meisenberg, Gerhard & Lynn, Richard (2011). Intelligence. A Measure of Human Capital in Nations. Journal of Social, Political and Economic Studies 36(4), 421-454.
Meisenberg, Gerhard & Williams, Amandy (2008). Are acquiescent and extreme response styles related to low intelligence and education? Personality and Individual Differences 44(7), 1539-1550. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.01.010
Munck, Gerardo L. (2009). Measuring Democracy: A Bridge between Scholarship and Politics. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Özmen, Yasar Pinar (2018). Hükümet sistemlerinin sosyoekonomik göstergelere göre karsilastirilmasi: Latin Amerika, Asya ve Dogu Avrupa ülkeleri [The comparison of government systems by socioeconomic indicators: Latin America, Asian And Eastern European Countries]. Gazi University. Political Science and Public Administration Department.
Prados de la Escosura, Leandro (2014). Capitalism and Human Welfare in L. Neal and J.G. Williamson (eds.), Cambridge History of Capitalism, 2 vols., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014. Vol. 2 The Spread of Capitalism: Cambridge From 1848 to 2010, pp. 501-529.
Prados de la Escosura, Leandro (2014). El desarrollo humano como libertad positiva: un panorama mundial desde 1870, Informacion Comercial Espanola 880 (2014), pp. 7-22.
Prados de la Escosura, Leandro (2015). Human Development as Positive Freedom: Latin America in Historical Perspective, Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 16 (3), pp. 342-373.
Prados de la Escosura, Leandro (2015). World Human Development, 1870-2007, Review of Income and Wealth 61 (2), pp. 220-247
Rindermann, Heiner (2007). The g-factor of international cognitive ability comparisons: the homogeneity of results in PISA, TIMSS, PIRLS and IQ-tests across nations. European Journal of Personality 21(5), p. 667-706. doi:10.1002/per.634
Rindermann, Heiner (2008). Relevance of education and intelligence at the national level for the economic welfare of people. Intelligence 36(2), 127-142. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2007.02.002
Rindermann, Heiner (2008). Relevance of education and intelligence for the political development of nations: Democracy, rule of law and political liberty. Intelligence 36(4), 306-322. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2007.09.003
Rindermann, Heiner & Meisenberg, Gerhard (2009). Relevance of education and intelligence at the national level for health: The case of HIV and AIDS. Intelligence 37(4), 383-395. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2009.03.005
Rindermann, Heiner & Sailer, Michal & Thompson, James (2009). The impact of smart fractions, cognitive ability of politicians and average competence of peoples on social development. Talent Development and Excellence 1(1), 3-25.
Saadi, Mohamed (2014). Does foreign direct investment increase exports' productivity? Evidence from developing and emerging countries. International Review of Applied Economics 28, pp 482-506. DOI:10.1080/02692171.2014.896879
Sevinc, Nurgul (2017). Are Richer Countries More Democratic? The Case of Muslim-Majority Countries (Unpublished master's thesis). TOBB University of Economics and Technology, Ankara.
Sommer, Jamie M. (2017): Grand and petty corruption: a cross-national analysis of forest loss in low- and middle-income nations, Environmental Sociology, DOI: 10.1080/23251042.2017.1348569
Spruk, Rok (2016). Institutional Transformation and the Origins of World Income Distribution. Journal of Comparative Economics 000(2016), 1-25. doi:10.1016/j.jce.2015.12.012
Suzuki, A. & Loizides, N. (2011). Escalation of interstate crises of conflictual dyads: Greece-Turkey and India-Pakistan. Cooperation and Conflict 46(1), 21-39. doi:10.1177/0010836710396770
Vanhanen, Tatu (2003). Democratization: A Comparative Analysis of 170 Countries. London: Routledge.
Vanhanen, Tatu (2006). Evolutionary Roots of Global Problems. Teoksessa: Aatteet, instituutiot ja poliittinen toiminta (toim. Ruostetsaari, Ilkka), 161-176. Tampere: Tampereen yliopisto. Studia Politica Tamperensis; 16.
Vanhanen, Tatu (2007). Human Diversity Reflected in Levels of Purchasing Power Parity, Democratization and the Human Condition. Mankind Quarterly 48(2), 141-155.
Vanhanen, Tatu (2008). Globaalit ongelmat. Helsinki: Terra Cognita.
Vanhanen, Tatu (2010). On the Evolutionary Limits of Democratization. Mankind Quarterly 51(1), 26-58.
Vanhanen, Tatu (2011). Globaalit haasteet. Demokratia, etninen väkivalta ja eriarvoisuus. Esitelmä Tilastoseuran Globaalit muutokset ja tilastotiede -iltapäiväseminaarissa 4.3.2010. Teoksessa: Suomen Tilastoseuran vuosikirja 2010, 104-115. Helsinki: Suomen Tilastoseura.
Vanhanen, Tatu (2011). National IQs and their demographic correlates. Personality and Individual Differences. Available online 7 September 2011. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.08.007
Vanhanen, Tatu (2012). Ethnic Conflicts. Their Biological Roots in Ethnic Nepotism. London: Ulster Institute for Social Research.
Vanhanen, Tatu (2013). Miksi Kiina lähtee lentoon ja Kongo ei? Yhteiskuntien älykkyyserot ja niiden huomiointi kehityksessä. Helsinki: East-West Books.
Vanhanen, Tatu (2014). Global Inequality as a Consequence of Human Diversity. A New Theory Tested by Empirical Evidence. London: Ulster Institute for Social Research.
Vanhanen, Tatu & Lynn, Richard (2004). The Roots of Global Disparaties in Human Diversity. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Hilton Chicago and the Palmer House Hilton, Chicago, IL, Sep 02, 2004. http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p61701_index.html [2009-05-26].
Wigley, S. & Akkoyunlu-Wigley, A. (2011). Do electoral institutions have an impact on population health? Public Choice 148(3-4), 595-610. doi:10.1007/s11127-010-9686-6
Wigley, S. & Akkoyunlu-Wigley, A. (2011). The impact of regime type on health: Does redistribution explain everything. World Politics 63(4), 647-677. doi:10.1017/S0043887111000177
Woodley, Michael M. (2012) Corrigendum to Inbreeding depression and IQ in a study of 72 countries. In: Intelligence 40(6):639-641. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2012.08.002
Metadata record is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 license.