Aineiston nimi

Family Barometer 2014: Family Policy in a Time of Crisis

Aineistonumero

FSD3005

Pysyvä tunniste

urn:nbn:fi:fsd:T-FSD3005

Aineiston laatu

Kvantitatiivinen aineisto

Tekijät

• Lainiala, Lassi (Family Federation of Finland. Population Research Institute)
• Miettinen, Anneli (Family Federation of Finland. Population Research Institute)
• Rotkirch, Anna (Family Federation of Finland. Population Research Institute)

Sisällön kuvaus

The study charted Finnish views on family policy and included themes such as family benefits, taxation, parenting, gender roles and work-life balance. Data collection was funded by Alli Paasikivi Foundation (80%) and Suomen kotien kukkasrahasto foundation (20%). Many of the questions in this survey have also been presented, for instance, in the previous Family Barometer (FSD2793).

The respondents' views were surveyed on how tax income should specifically be allocated if it was used to support families with children (e.g. on day care services, child health care), and the importance of various measures that could be taken to improve the circumstances of families with children. Views were surveyed on the ideal number of children, plans to have more children, and reasons for not planning to have more children (e.g. own health, uncertain employment situation). The respondents were also asked whether their plans related to having a child would change if family benefits and services were improved.

Opinions were surveyed on the level of child benefit and child home care allowance as well as the length of parental leave and part-time child care leave. Other questions related to part-time child care leave charted whether the respondents had been on the leave with their youngest child and for how long, whether spouse had been on the leave, reasons for being on the leave a longer or shorter time than desired, and reasons for not taking the leave (e.g. negative attitude of employer, new job). The respondents were asked the age at which a child is ready to be cared for outside the home, and to what extent they agreed with a number of statements relating to gender roles and significance of children and family.

Views were investigated on the reasons for the fact that many Finns either postponed parenthood or did not have children at all. Finally, the respondents were asked which potential changes to family leave they found acceptable and how the state had succeeded in improving the well-being of families and children.

Background variables included, among others, the respondent's date of birth, gender, mother tongue, region of residence, marital status, household composition, level of education, economic activity and occupational status, political party choice, self-perceived social class, and personal gross annual income. Further background variables included the spouse's year of birth and education, the mother tongues of the members of the household, household size, number and ages of children in the household, gross annual income of the household, and the respondent's/family's financial situation.

Asiasanat

child care; child day care; children; families; family benefits; family life; family policy; labour and employment; parental benefits; parental leave; parental role; parents; social security benefits

Tieteenala/Aihealue

• Social sciences (OKM:n tieteenalaluokitus)
• Social welfare policy (CESSDAn aihepiiriluokitus)
• Family life and marriage (CESSDAn aihepiiriluokitus)
• Social welfare systems/structures (CESSDAn aihepiiriluokitus)

Sarja

Family Barometers

Jakelija

Finnish Social Science Data Archive

Käyttöoikeudet

The dataset is (B) available for research, teaching and study.

Kerääjät

• TNS Gallup Finland

Tuottajat

• Family Federation of Finland. Population Research Institute

Ajallinen kattavuus

2013 – 2014

Aineistonkeruun ajankohta

2013-11-15 – 2013-12-04

Maa

Finland

Kohdealue

Finland

Havaintoyksikkötyyppi

Individual

Perusjoukko/otos

People aged 20-55 living in Finland (poislukien the Åland Islands)

Tutkimuksen aikaulottuvuus

Longitudinal: Trend/Repeated cross-section

Otantamenetelmä

Probability

The respondents were members of TNS Gallup Finland's panel. The aim was to draw a sample from the panel that was as representative of the target population as possible. The number of persons selected for the study was 5,036, out of whom 2,619 responded. The overall response rate was affected by the low response rate among young men (29%).

Keruumenetelmä

Self-administered questionnaire: Web-based (CAWI)

Keruuväline tai –ohje

Structured questionnaire

Vastausprosentti

52

Datatiedostojen kieli

Aineistopaketti voi sisältää samoja tiedostoja eri kielisinä.

Aineisto sisältää datatiedostoja seuraavilla kielillä: suomi.

Tietoarkisto kääntää kvantitatiivisia datatiedostoja englanniksi. Lisätietoja käännöspyynnön jättämisestä.

Datan versio

2.0

Katso myös

FSD2793 Family Barometer 2010: Family Policy

Painokertoimet

There is a weight variable 'wtvl' in the data, which corrects the sample distributions on age and gender to match the population.

Viittausvaatimus

The data and its creators shall be cited in all publications and presentations for which the data have been used. The bibliographic citation may be in the form suggested by the archive or in the form required by the publication.

Malliviittaus

Lainiala, Lassi (Family Federation of Finland) & Miettinen, Anneli (Family Federation of Finland) & Rotkirch, Anna (Family Federation of Finland): Family Barometer 2014: Family Policy in a Time of Crisis [dataset]. Version 2.0 (2018-08-21). Finnish Social Science Data Archive [distributor]. https://urn.fi/urn:nbn:fi:fsd:T-FSD3005

Julkaisusta tiedottaminen

Notify FSD of all publications where you have used the data by sending the citation information to user-services.fsd@tuni.fi.

Erityisehdot

Users of the data shall send Väestöliitto [Family Federation of Finland] a copy of all research publications based on or using the data. Publications shall be sent to the mail address: Väestöliitto, Väestöntutkimuslaitos, PL 849, 00101 HELSINKI, FINLAND.

Varaumat

The original data creators and the archive bear no responsibility for any results or interpretations arising from the reuse of the data.

Käytön ja kuvailun oheismateriaalit

Lainiala, Lassi (2014). Perhebarometri 2014. Perhepolitiikka kriisin aikana. Helsinki: Väestöliitto. Väestöntutkimuslaitos. Katsauksia E 48/2014.

Julkaisut aineistosta

Lainiala, Lassi (2014). Perhebarometri 2014. Perhepolitiikka kriisin aikana. Helsinki: Väestöliitto. Väestöntutkimuslaitos. Katsauksia E 48/2014.

Varjamo, Viivi (2016). Suomalaisten suhtautuminen lasten kotihoidon tukeen. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän yliopisto. Yhteiskuntatieteiden laitos. Yhteiskuntapolitiikan pro gradu -tutkielma.

Salmela, Riikka (2020) Tulisiko isyysvapaata pidentää? Kvantitatiivinen tutkimus suomalaisten asennoitumisesta isyysvapaan kehittämiseen. Kandidaatintutkielma, Tampereen ylipisto.

Niemimaa, Karoliina (2020). Vanhempien koulutustaustan yhteys perheen lapsilukuun. Tampere: Tampereen yliopisto. Kasvatustieteiden kandidaatintutkinto.URN:NBN:fi:tuni-201912036515

Golovina K, Nitsche N, Berg V, Miettinen A, Rotkirch A, Jokela M (2023). Birth cohort changes in fertility ideals: Evidence from repeated cross-sectional surveys in Finland. European Sociological Review, jcad048. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcad048