Display study description .

FSD2797 Gender Minorities at Work 2003

The dataset is (C) available for research only (including e.g. Master's, licentiate and doctoral theses). The dataset may not be used for other theses (e.g. Bachelor's or polytechnic theses), for other study purposes (e.g. seminar papers, essays) or teaching.

Download the data

Study description in other languages

Related files

  • No other files available

Authors

  • Lehtonen, Jukka P. (University of Helsinki. Department of Behavioural Sciences)
  • Mustola, Kati (University of Helsinki. Department of Social Research)

Keywords

career, discrimination, employees, equal opportunity, gender, gender identity, labour and employment, minority groups, occupational life, social inequality, transgender people

Abstract

Gender Minorities at Work 2003 explored the work-related circumstances and experiences of gender minorities in Finland. People belonging to gender minorities were asked about their education, work history, workplace and its atmosphere, experiences of discrimination and openness about their belonging to a gender minority. The study was part of the EQUAL Initiative funded by the European Social Fund and Ministry of Employment, Finland whose aim was to chart and improve the labour market position of lesbians, gays, bisexuals and trans people.

The respondents were first asked background information such as what their biological sex at birth had been, what their psychological gender was, which definition they preferred to use of themselves, whether they expressed their gender through appearance and clothing, to whom they had told about their belonging to a gender minority and how these people had reacted, and which definition they used of their sexual orientation.

The respondents were asked questions relating to their education and work history such as educational and career choices based on negative or positive attitudes toward gender minorities in a certain field, total number of years in employment, job changes in the previous five years and whether job change had been affected by negative attitudes toward gender minorities in the workplace. Relating to the current or latest job the respondents were asked, for example, how long they had had the job, whether they were working part time or full time, whether their contract was permanent or temporary, how many employees there were at the workplace and how many of them women, whether there was social pressure at the workplace for them to express their expected gender or hide their true gender, whether their immediate supervisor was a man or woman and how often they saw their co-workers during their leisure time.

Openness about belonging to a gender minority was charted with questions on whether there were other people belonging to gender minorities at the workplace and whether it mattered to the respondents, how many co-workers and clients, students etc. knew of the respondents' gender identity, how people at the workplace had found out about it. Those who hid their gender identity at the workplace were asked how distressing they felt the hiding and fear of revealing themselves was.

Atmosphere at work was investigated with several questions relating to support received at work, expectations of others, conflicts or violence at the workplace and bullying and harassment. Different kinds of work-related threats perceived by the respondents were examined as well as factors influencing their coping at work (e.g. strict/flexible gender roles, general atmosphere).

The final section of the questionnaire focused on discrimination at work. The questions included topics such as discrimination of different groups at the workplace, the respondents' personal experiences of discrimination in different situations and readiness to contact different authorities in case of discrimination.

To enable comparisons, some of the questions are the same as in the Quality of work life surveys of Statistics Finland and the annual Finnish Working Life Barometers of the Ministry of Employment and the Economy, Finland. Background variables included, among others, the respondent's year of birth, mother tongue, nationality, relationship status, province of residence and type of municipality of residence.

Permanent link to this dataset:

Direct link to this tab:

Study description in machine readable DDI 2.0 format

Metadata record is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 license.