FSD0119 ISSP 2002: perhe ja muuttuvat sukupuoliroolit III: Suomen aineisto

Related Publications Tooltip

Tirronen, Katja (2005). Pienten lasten isien asenteet kotityöhön, ansiotyöhön ja perhe-elämään. Savonlinna: Joensuun yliopisto. Savonlinnan opettajankoulutuslaitos. Kotitaloustieteen pro gradu -tutkielma.

Talvenkorpi, Heidi (2004). "Osaatko sanoa?": posti- ja käyntikyselyiden kautta tarkasteltuna. Kuopio: Kuopion yliopisto. Sosiaalityön ja sosiaalipedagogiikan pro gradu -tutkielma.

Anttonen, Anneli & Sipilä, Jorma (2007). Care Capital, Stress and Satisfaction. In: Women, Men, Work and Family in Europe (eds. Crompton, Rosmary & Clare Lyonette), 152-170. Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills.

Oinas, Tomi (2010). Sukupuolten välinen kotityönjako kahden ansaitsijan perheissä. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän yliopisto. Jyväskylä studies in education, psychology and social research; 402. URN:ISBN:978-951-39-4117-8

Suolinna, Satu (2012). Ryhmien moniulotteisten erojen testaus. Helsingin yliopisto: Sosiaalitieteiden laitos. Tilastotieteen pro gradu -tutkielma. hdl:10138/33437

Tai, Tsui-O, and Janeen Baxter. 2018. Perceptions of Fairness and Housework Disagreement: A Comparative Analysis. Journal of Family Issues 39(8): 2461-2485. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X18758346

Mcginn, Kathleen L., Mayra Ruiz Castro, and Elizabeth Long Lingo. 2018. Learning from Mum: Cross-National Evidence Linking Maternal Employment and Adult Children's Outcomes. Work, Employment & Society Online first.

Schleutker, Elina 2017. Women's work-life preferences: reconceptualization and cross-country description over time. European Societies 19(3): 292-312.

Choi, G. 2019. Revisiting the redistribution hypothesis with perceived inequality and redistributive preferences. European Journal of Political Economy.

Tyrowicz, Joanna, and Magdalena Smyk. 2019. Wage Inequality and Structural Change. Social Indicators Research 141(2): 503-538.

Kleven, Henrik Jacobsen, and Camille Landais. 2017. Gender Inequality and Economic Development: Fertility, Education and Norms. Economica 84(334): 180-209.

Ugur, Zeynep B. (2019): Does Having Children Bring Life Satisfaction in Europe?. In: Journal of Happiness Studies: An Interdisciplinary Forum on Subjective Well-Being: 22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00135-5.

Ariely, Gal (2019): The nexus between globalization and ethnic identity: A view from below. In: Ethnicities 19 (5): 763783. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796819834951.

Biolcati, Ferruccio; Molteni, Francesco; Quandt, Markus & Vezzoni, Cristiano (2020): Church Attendance and Religious change Pooled European dataset (CARPE): a survey harmonization project for the comparative analysis of long-term trends in individual religiosity. Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, 1-25. DOI: 10.1007/s11135-020-01048-9.

Engler, Sarah and Weisstanner, David. 2021.The threat of social decline: income inequality and radical right support. Journal of European Public Policy 28:2, 153-173. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2020.1733636.

Neimanns, Erik. 2021. Unequal benefits - diverging attitudes? Analysing the effects of an unequal expansion of childcare provision on attitudes towards maternal employment across 18 European countries. Journal of Public Policy 41(2):251-76. doi: 10.1017/S0143814X19000333.

Mandel, H. and Lazarus, A. 2021. Contextual Effects on the Gendered Division of Housework: A Cross-Country and Cross-Time Analysis. Sex Roles. doi: 10.1007/s11199-020-01215

Jozwiak, Andreas (2021): It's a Family (Policy) Affair: Family Policies and Heterogeneity in Gender Attitudes. In: Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society: 215-239. doi:10.1093/sp/jxab007

Biolcati, Ferruccio; Molteni, Francesco; Quandt, Markus and Vezzoni, Cristiano (2022): "Church Attendance and Religious change Pooled European dataset (CARPE): a survey harmonization project for the comparative analysis of long-term trends in individual religiosity." In: Quality and Quantity 56 (3): 1729-1753. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135020-01048-9.

Study description in machine readable DDI-C 2.5 format

Creative Commons License
Metadata record is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.